How SOME might use #reverseengineering to DELIVER #neoterrorismontheindividual

In my previous post I described a third element to my #gutenbergofintuitivethinking: the #ripple team – or “rewind intuition people”. These would be highly creative individuals, with the relevant tech tools, able to read back and reverse-engineer every step of a what-to-date has been unpredictable crime: #neocrime.

But what if the same configuration of humans and tech could be used to #gaslight, using very 21st century technologies such as #ai, the lives, work trajectories, and real-world experiences of everyday citizens as they went about their ordinary lives?

Let’s imagine the following scenario: say you want to make a key potential future societal disruptor become mentally unstable. One of the things that most distresses human beings is surely that feeling of hopelessness that comes from poverty – either of finances, or just as importantly of spirit. And that distress, it is my judgement, will mainly be sourced in a fierce and depression-generating lack of agency – in other words, that growing and seemingly uncontrollable absence of free will. That is to say, believing we have no ability to shape or forge our own futures, never mind our wider society’s.

It’s true. There are many, perhaps the majority of, #ai companies at all levels which love to transmit the idea they can already predict – maybe even forcibly make “predestinable” – those years-to-come that will offer huge competitive advantage to the outfits that manage to achieve such technologies.

But let’s say, whilst a legitimate goal, it’s not yet as usefully in place as it could be. And let’s say some of these companies – out of a more or less criminal impatience – cannot wait for what they argue is inevitable: that every step of every person, organisation, and in their world always enemy, will become utterly predictable in all their most human – and suddenly inhuman – ways.

What I am suggesting here is that the gaslighting that is being carried out, this #neoterrorismontheindividual which tracks specific human beings over decades, is delivered not via immense predictive capacities but, rather, through huge observational activities. I see you look at a clearly significant word as you walk down the street, and so later in the evening I engineer a social-media event which replicates your inevitable memory of that word, and makes you inevitably feel you have zero agency, zero free will, and zero human – where not human(e) – capacity for true spontaneity.

Some criminal companies and associations in the field of #ai simply cannot wait to remove agency from all human experience. Tbh, many politicians, perhaps all to some gently terrifying extent, being the salespeople by nature that they always have been, have attempted to deliver the same effect throughout the sometimes horribly variegated history of Western liberal democracy. So it’s hardly surprising that business may follow the example so rigorously.

What can we do? First, become savvier “observers” and “consumers” of our environments, both real-world and virtual. Yes. It’s aggressive, it’s fascist, and it’s quite wrong what they are doing. But we can educate ourselves, and each other, much better.

Second, help me develop the #gutenbergofintuitivethinking: the #intuitionvalidationengine, the #ivepics frontend with integrated #ai, and the newly conceived #ripple team tools.

WDYT? Are you ready?

#artificial-intelligence, #gaslighting, #observation, #prediction

“Reverse-engineering #neocrime in times of the unpredicted”

A suggestion for a near-future tool

I’ve been discussing for a year now the concept of #neoterrorismontheindividual, and #neoterrorism more widely. I am suggesting that such #terrorisms cannot be extracted and foreseen via our experiences of the past.

Simply anticipating them using datasets of all other prior violences is not enough. In this sense, 9/11 might only have been usefully predicted by creative thinking: for it surely took a malevolently creative mind to think it up in the first place.

So it beholds us to use the platforms and core tools I have been suggesting for a while: tentatively since 2017, more fiercely since 2018 onwards.

These include, broadly speaking, what I call the #gutenbergofintuitivethinking. For the moment, this has constituted:

1. The core libraries which might form the #intuitionvalidationengine.
2. #ivepics, the frontend with integrated #ai, to “prove everything you know”, particularly in an intuitive sense.

On my journey to here, since 2016, I encountered predatory conspiracy against my person and business interests, whilst I first had management consulting in my sights. It’s an industry unchanged since the 1930s, and I therefore considered it ripe for change.

It is no longer my beach-head market. I guess you may all breathe a sigh of relief.

Instead, #lawenforcement, #security, and #crimevictimexperience now have become, at least in my opinion, this fabulous first step.

In a world of unpredicted, however, where we need #intuition, #arationality, and the #highleveldomainexpertise of thinking without thinking, we will also need to understand, after an atrocity, after a #neocrime or act of #nationstate #neodefence, what happened. Because we will often arrive late to the abusive party.

Let us at least know how to creatively reverse-engineer and unpick every step of the evil, for future reference.

This sort of thinking, then, brings us inevitably to the third and most recent item on our list:

3. We need what I have decided to call a #ripple team: “rewind intuition people”, if you like. A little whimsy on my part, as if never before!

🙂

A group of professional intelligence creatives able, with the relevant tech, to rewind – ie #reverseengineer – the thinking processes of the worst that creative #inhumanity can devise.

That’s the third leg to our stool of intuition tools. And that’s what I now begin to strongly suggest we also develop.

#neocriminals, #neoterrorists

We need to do much better #ivepics

So I agree.

But let me offer you an example for you to better understand my position over the past 17¾ years.

Torija explains how in the 1970s representative democracy represented the interests of the median voter. By 2009, the right-wing parties represented the top 3 percentiles. The left-wing, no more than the top 6.

If we accept Torija is right, and our representative democracy now fails so dramatically to represent, what can our representative security have done more effectively in this time?

Yes. I said I agreed. I know. And I still do. Citizen safety depends on combining a security of real with a permanent quality of lived experience.

And yes: we could have a more secure society by terrifying citizens into permanent vigilance. We could reveal everything I have seen for myself re the #neoterrorismontheindividual that I have suffered from for all this time.

And it would be far more secure, but paradoxically far less safe.

For safety resides in both its perception as well as its reality. So if we destroy our ignorance of most of the bad, the bad we suddenly see destroys us – even when it never ends up happening.

But there is one case when society must do far more. If it fails to intervene representatively on a #neoterrorism committed as I suggest has been committed on me, and it fails to give the citizen in question even the information about the fact that it is taking place, then it sacrifices the life of a living, breathing human being for the sake of a terrible expediency.

But worse than this: and here I am beginning to believe it’s been my case. Worse is that our representative security – in parallel with our representative democracy over the same time – has not just chosen to ignore and/or found itself dramatically in the dark about #neoterrorismontheindividual, it actually has preferred – consciously elected – to lock those people up who saw it for themselves, through growing societal accusations of unexplained and increasing incidences of mental distress multiple, including paranoia and schizophrenia.

By our security agencies refusing even to investigate the possibility that the distress was caused by real activity, not schizophrenic imaginings, illegal and legal #mafias have had the freedom to spend the last twenty or thirty #tech #digital years tracking, shaping, dismantling and destroying – at will! – the livelihoods, families, friendships and ultimately entire lives of concrete, discrete, specific and cruelly-targeted individuals.

So where I cannot agree with you is here: if you choose not to, or worse are quite unable to, defend my life and honour stealthily through your own well-meaning counter-interventions, either because you know and operationally can’t, or – far more tragically – you simply didn’t realise it was taking place, and couldn’t believe in people like me, at the very least you must give us the information and means to properly defend ourselves from processes of gaslighting on these dreadfully automated scales.

Otherwise you choose to advantage the #mafias over the interests of those you clearly serve: subjects and residents both, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

No?

#ivepics

#neoterrorists