So I agree.

But let me offer you an example for you to better understand my position over the past 17¾ years.

Torija explains how in the 1970s representative democracy represented the interests of the median voter. By 2009, the right-wing parties represented the top 3 percentiles. The left-wing, no more than the top 6.

If we accept Torija is right, and our representative democracy now fails so dramatically to represent, what can our representative security have done more effectively in this time?

Yes. I said I agreed. I know. And I still do. Citizen safety depends on combining a security of real with a permanent quality of lived experience.

And yes: we could have a more secure society by terrifying citizens into permanent vigilance. We could reveal everything I have seen for myself re the #neoterrorismontheindividual that I have suffered from for all this time.

And it would be far more secure, but paradoxically far less safe.

For safety resides in both its perception as well as its reality. So if we destroy our ignorance of most of the bad, the bad we suddenly see destroys us – even when it never ends up happening.

But there is one case when society must do far more. If it fails to intervene representatively on a #neoterrorism committed as I suggest has been committed on me, and it fails to give the citizen in question even the information about the fact that it is taking place, then it sacrifices the life of a living, breathing human being for the sake of a terrible expediency.

But worse than this: and here I am beginning to believe it’s been my case. Worse is that our representative security – in parallel with our representative democracy over the same time – has not just chosen to ignore and/or found itself dramatically in the dark about #neoterrorismontheindividual, it actually has preferred – consciously elected – to lock those people up who saw it for themselves, through growing societal accusations of unexplained and increasing incidences of mental distress multiple, including paranoia and schizophrenia.

By our security agencies refusing even to investigate the possibility that the distress was caused by real activity, not schizophrenic imaginings, illegal and legal #mafias have had the freedom to spend the last twenty or thirty #tech #digital years tracking, shaping, dismantling and destroying – at will! – the livelihoods, families, friendships and ultimately entire lives of concrete, discrete, specific and cruelly-targeted individuals.

So where I cannot agree with you is here: if you choose not to, or worse are quite unable to, defend my life and honour stealthily through your own well-meaning counter-interventions, either because you know and operationally can’t, or – far more tragically – you simply didn’t realise it was taking place, and couldn’t believe in people like me, at the very least you must give us the information and means to properly defend ourselves from processes of gaslighting on these dreadfully automated scales.

Otherwise you choose to advantage the #mafias over the interests of those you clearly serve: subjects and residents both, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

No?

#ivepics

#neoterrorists